- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Works by Ernest D. Prentice
12 found
Order:
- Institutional Review Board assessment of risks and benefits associated with research.Ernest D. Prentice & Bruce G. Gordon - forthcoming - National Bioethics Advisory Commission 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 700, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7979 Telephone: 301-402-4242• Fax: 301-480-6900• Website: Www. Bioethics. Gov.
- Women in early phase trials: an IRB's deliberations.James R. Anderson, Toby L. Schonfeld, Timothy K. Kelso & Ernest D. Prentice - 2002 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (4):7-11.
- Can Children Be Enrolled in a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Synthetic Growth Hormone?Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Andrew Jameton, Benjamin Graber & Thomas Sears - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (1):6.
- Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples.Mary Adams, Ernest D. Prentice & Gwenn S. F. Oki - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 18 (2):6-7.
- An Institutional Policy on the Right to Benefit from the Commercialization of Human Biological Material.Ernest D. Prentice, John C. Wiltse, John G. Sharp & Dean L. Antonson - 1990 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (1-2):162-167.
- An Institutional Policy on the Right to Benefit from the Commercialization of Human Biological Material.Ernest D. Prentice, John C. Wiltse, John G. Sharp & Dean L. Antonson - 1990 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (1-2):162-167.
- A Protocol Review Guide to Reduce IRB Inconsistency.Ernest D. Prentice & L. Antonson - 1987 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 9 (1):9.
- An Update on the PEG-SOD Study Involving Incompetent Subjects: FDA Permits an Exception to Informed Consent Requirements.Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Lyal G. Leibrock, Vikram C. Prabhu, Timothy K. Kelso & Thomas D. Sears - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (1/2):16.
- Bill of Rights for Research Subjects.Ernest D. Prentice, Paul J. Reitemeier, L. Antonson, Timothy K. Kelso & Andrew Jameton - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (2):7.No categories
- Consistency in Interpreting Federal Regulations Helps Assure Equitable Treatment of Subjects.Ernest D. Prentice - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (1):11.
- IRB Review of Adverse Events in Investigational Drug Studies. [REVIEW]Ernest D. Prentice & Bruce Gordon - 1997 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 19 (6):1.
- IRB Review of a Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial Involving Incompetent Patients Suffering from Severe Closed Head Injury. [REVIEW]Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Lyal G. Leibrock, Timothy K. Kelso & Thomas D. Sears - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (5):1.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo